I received the following e-mail, original author unknown:
>I hope I haven't misunderstood your instructions. Because to be honest,
>none of this Y to K problem makes any sense to me.
>
>At any rate I have finished converting all the months on all the company
>calendars so that the year 2000 is ready to go with the following new
>months:
>
>Januark
>Februark
>Mak
>Julk
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Trust the computer industry to shorten "Year 2000" to Y2K. It
>was this kind of thinking that caused the problem in the first
>place.