DNS articles
Brad Templeton Home
Brad Ideas
(My Blog)
ClariNet

Interviews

EFF

Jokes / RHF

Photo Pages

Panoramic Photos

SF Publishing

Software

Articles

Spam

DNS

Dot!

Packages

Interests


RHF Home

Copyright Myths

Emily Postnews

Africa

Burning Man

Alice Pascal

The Rules for Guys

Bill Gates

Why does there have to be a root?

Why does there have to be a root?

Some people have proposed an even more diverse system than my trademarked TLDs, namely the elimination of a root altogether. These rootless systems would simply allow anybody to declare to be a directory, and hope to get customers. To look up a name, you would need to know both the directory company and a way to reach it, and the name within it.

Their plans don't work because they don't meet the goals that a lot of people have for DNS. They simply move the question up another level, since there needs to be some way of identifying and finding the directory companies, and that's a root with another name.

I want to be able to hand people a business card. On it I want an E-mail address that's not too hard to read and type or remember. The E-mail address has to be 100% reliable. It shouldn't go to different people depending on which directory service they subscribe to. It shouldn't work for some people and not for others.

A rootless DNS doesn't solve that problem.